QT Funded vs Audacity Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT FUNDED DETAILS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
+Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
+Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.

−Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
−Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.

QT Funded

Higher trust score (65/100). Slower payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

Audacity Capital

Lower trust score (63/100). Faster payouts at 0d. 90% profit split.