RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

QT Funded vs Amplify Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
AMPT
Amplify Trading
QT FUNDED
METRIC
AMPLIFY TRADING
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$400,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$12
MIN COST
—
1d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

AMPLIFY TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

Amplify Trading PROS

  • +Based in the United Kingdom, a well-regulated financial jurisdiction
  • +UK base may offer traders greater confidence in regulatory oversight
  • +Established country presence provides geographic transparency
  • +Listed on PropDNA, giving traders a discovery reference point

Amplify Trading CONS

  • −No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
  • −No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
  • −Traders cannot make an informed comparison without any measurable metrics

PROPDNA VERDICT

QT Funded
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.
Amplify Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

QT Funded Full Review →Amplify Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy