RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Quadeye vs The Trading Pit Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QDEY

Quadeye

TTPF

The Trading Pit Futures

QUADEYE

METRIC

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

QUADEYE DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

THE TRADING PIT FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Quadeye PROS

+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

Quadeye CONS

−No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
−India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory complexity for international traders
−Absence of data on profit split, funding, drawdown, or payouts limits trader confidence

The Trading Pit Futures PROS

+Based in Liechtenstein, which has a well-regulated financial environment offering potential trader protections.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

The Trading Pit Futures CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for The Trading Pit Futures, making comparison impossible.
−Absence of drawdown, profit split, and funding figures prevents any meaningful evaluation.
−Note: as a futures firm, drawdown may be expressed in dollar terms and cannot be compared to the 7.9% CFD average.

PROPDNA VERDICT