RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Quadeye vs Savius

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QDEY
Quadeye
SVUS
Savius
EST. 2013
QUADEYE
METRIC
SAVIUS
0/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$300,000
—
MIN COST
$285
—
PAYOUT DAYS
3d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

QUADEYE DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

SAVIUS DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures, Indices
PLATFORMS
ATAS, Quantower

Quadeye PROS

  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
  • +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

Quadeye CONS

  • −No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
  • −India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory complexity for international traders
  • −Absence of data on profit split, funding, drawdown, or payouts limits trader confidence

Savius PROS

  • +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7% by 5.3 percentage points
  • +Days to first payout is 3, significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, simplifying the path to capital
  • +Founded in 2013, making it one of the more established prop firms with over a decade of operation

Savius CONS

  • −Max funding of $300,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential
  • −Min challenge cost of $285 is significantly higher than the industry average of $186.70
  • −Overall drawdown of 4% is considerably tighter than the industry average of 7.9%, increasing risk of disqualification

PROPDNA VERDICT

Quadeye
Higher trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Savius
Higher trust score (0/100). Faster payouts at 3d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Quadeye Full Review →Savius Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy