RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Quadeye vs BlackEdge Capital

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QDEY

Quadeye

BLEC

BlackEdge Capital

QUADEYE

METRIC

BLACKEDGE CAPITAL

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

QUADEYE DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

BLACKEDGE CAPITAL DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Quadeye PROS

+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

Quadeye CONS

−No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
−India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory complexity for international traders
−Absence of data on profit split, funding, drawdown, or payouts limits trader confidence

BlackEdge Capital PROS

+Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided; no metrics to evaluate

BlackEdge Capital CONS

−No firm data was provided, making any meaningful comparison to industry averages impossible
−Without metrics, traders cannot assess profit split, funding, drawdown, or payout terms
−Lack of data is itself a transparency concern for traders making real financial decisions

PROPDNA VERDICT