RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Quadeye vs Audacity Capital
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
QDEY
Quadeye
AUDC
Audacity Capital
EST. 2012
QUADEYE
METRIC
AUDACITY CAPITAL
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER60/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER3.5/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
—
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
—
MIN COST
$42
—
PAYOUT DAYS
0d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
QUADEYE DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
AUDACITY CAPITAL DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Static
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
Quadeye PROS
- +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
- +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
- +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
- +Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
Quadeye CONS
- −No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
- −India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory complexity for international traders
- −Absence of data on profit split, funding, drawdown, or payouts limits trader confidence
Audacity Capital PROS
- +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7, offering exceptional capital access.
- +Min challenge cost of $42 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry highly accessible.
- +Days to first payout of 0 allows immediate profit access, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, and fee refund is also offered, boosting net returns.
Audacity Capital CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 15% is nearly double the industry average of 7.9%, exposing traders to significantly higher risk.
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to complete evaluation.
- −Market coverage is limited to Forex only, restricting diversification across asset classes.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy