RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Quadeye vs 3Red Partners

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

QDEY

Quadeye

3RED

3Red Partners

QUADEYE

METRIC

3RED PARTNERS

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

QUADEYE DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

3RED PARTNERS DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Quadeye PROS

+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate
+Placeholder pro — no data provided beyond country; no metrics to evaluate

Quadeye CONS

−No trading metrics were provided, preventing any comparison to industry averages
−India-based prop firms may face additional regulatory complexity for international traders
−Absence of data on profit split, funding, drawdown, or payouts limits trader confidence

3Red Partners PROS

+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+No further data is available to substantiate additional pros at this time.
+No platform or market data is provided to assess trading conditions.
+No funding or cost data is available to compare against industry benchmarks.

3Red Partners CONS

−Almost no operational data is available for 3Red Partners, making meaningful comparison impossible.
−No profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost are disclosed for benchmark comparison.
−Traders cannot assess trading conditions or earning potential without core metrics being provided.

PROPDNA VERDICT