RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Pip Traders Funding vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PTFD

Pip Traders Funding

QT Funded

EST. 2023

PIP TRADERS FUNDING

METRIC

QT FUNDED

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER72/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

80%

—

MAX FUNDING

$400,000

—

MIN COST

$12

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

Pip Traders Funding PROS

+The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
+A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
+Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
+Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
−Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Pip Traders Funding

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH PTFD