RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Pip Traders Funding vs OneUp Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
OneUp Trader
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
METRIC
ONEUP TRADER
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER51/100
0/5
RATING
BETTER4/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$250,000
MIN COST
$125
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
PASS RATE
0
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Futures
PLATFORMS
NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES
futures, large-cap

Pip Traders Funding PROS

  • +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
  • +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
  • +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

OneUp Trader PROS

  • +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
  • +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
  • +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

  • Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Pip Traders Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
OneUp Trader
Higher trust score (51/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Pip Traders Funding Full Review →OneUp Trader Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy