RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
Pip Traders Funding vs OneUp Trader
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
METRIC
ONEUP TRADER
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER51/100
0/5—
RATING
BETTER4/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$250,000
—
MIN COST
$125
—
PAYOUT DAYS
14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER1
PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
Pip Traders Funding PROS
- +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
- +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
- +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
- +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.
Pip Traders Funding CONS
- −No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
- −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
- −Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy