RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Pip Traders Funding vs Kershner Trading Group

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PTFD

Pip Traders Funding

KRTG

Kershner Trading Group

EST. 2001

PIP TRADERS FUNDING

METRIC

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP

0/100TIE

TRUST SCORE

TIE0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

—

MAX FUNDING

—

MIN COST

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

KERSHNER TRADING GROUP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

Pip Traders Funding PROS

+The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
+A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
+Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
+Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
−Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

Kershner Trading Group PROS

+Founded in 2001, making Kershner Trading Group one of the longer-established firms with over 23 years of history.
+US-based firm operating in a well-known and scrutinised financial jurisdiction.
+Decades of operation may indicate robust risk management and institutional-level infrastructure.
+Long track record provides a level of credibility that newer prop firms cannot demonstrate.

Kershner Trading Group CONS

−No profit split, max funding, drawdown, or challenge cost data is provided for comparison.
−Absence of platform and market data makes it impossible to assess trading conditions or flexibility.
−Traders cannot benchmark Kershner against industry averages without core financial and operational metrics.

PROPDNA VERDICT