RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Pip Traders Funding vs FXIFY

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PTFD
Pip Traders Funding
FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
PIP TRADERS FUNDING
METRIC
FXIFY
0/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
MIN COST
$32
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
15%
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

Pip Traders Funding PROS

  • +The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
  • +A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
  • +Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

  • No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Pip Traders Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Pip Traders Funding Full Review →FXIFY Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy