RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs V Prop Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PFAR

PipFarm

EST. 2023

VPRT

V Prop Trader

PIPFARM

METRIC

V PROP TRADER

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

85%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER95%

$200,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$45

MIN COST

—

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex, fast-payout

V PROP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
MARKETS: Forex, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, VTrader

PipFarm PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
−Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

V Prop Trader PROS

+Profit split of 95% is significantly above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
+Days to first payout of 0 means traders can access profits immediately, well below the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Offers MT5 alongside the proprietary VTrader platform, providing at least one widely recognised trading environment.
+Covers both Forex and Crypto markets, giving traders access to high-liquidity and high-volatility asset classes.

V Prop Trader CONS

−No max funding, challenge cost, or drawdown data is provided for comparison against industry averages.
−Two steps to funded is above the industry average of 1.6, requiring additional evaluation stages.
−Limited market coverage of only two asset classes may restrict diversification compared to broader offerings.

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm

Higher trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH PFAR