RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs The Funded Trader

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PFAR

PipFarm

EST. 2023

TFTR

The Funded Trader

PIPFARM

METRIC

THE FUNDED TRADER

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

85%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$600,000

$45BETTER

MIN COST

—$489

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex, fast-payout

THE FUNDED TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
PLATFORMS: MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, cTrader

PipFarm PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
−Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

The Funded Trader PROS

+News trading is explicitly allowed, giving traders more strategic flexibility during high-impact events.
+Offers three platforms including MATCH-TRADER, DXTrade, and cTrader, well above typical single-platform firms.
+Overall drawdown of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, broadly in line with norms.
+Max funding of $600,000 is below the industry average of $839,272.7 but still a substantial capital allocation.

The Funded Trader CONS

−Min challenge cost of $489 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7, raising the barrier to entry.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring stronger performance to pass evaluation.
−Two steps to funded exceeds the industry average of 1.6, adding time and cost before reaching a live account.

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH PFAR