RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
QT Funded
QT
QT Funded
EST. 2023
PIPFARM
METRIC
QT FUNDED
72/100TIE
TRUST SCORE
TIE72/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$400,000
$45
MIN COST
BETTER$12
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

QT Funded PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
  • +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
  • +Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
QT Funded
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

PipFarm Full Review →QT Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy