RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs Ment Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
MNTF
Ment Funding
PIPFARM
METRIC
MENT FUNDING
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$45
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

MENT FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

Ment Funding PROS

  • +Listed on PropDNA, giving traders a reference point for discovery
  • +No restrictive data points provided that could indicate unfavorable terms
  • +Absence of negative metrics means no confirmed below-average figures
  • +Firm identity is established enough to be catalogued for comparison

Ment Funding CONS

  • −No data provided on profit split, max funding, or challenge cost
  • −No trading conditions such as drawdown, profit target, or payout terms are available
  • −Traders cannot make an informed decision without any comparable metrics

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Ment Funding
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

PipFarm Full Review →Ment Funding Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy