RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs For Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PFAR

PipFarm

EST. 2023

FORT

For Traders

EST. 2023

PIPFARM

METRIC

FOR TRADERS

56/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER58/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—3/5

85%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$300,000

$45—

MIN COST

BETTER$42

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER2d

—

PASS RATE

—

1TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE1

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex, fast-payout

FOR TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: cTrader, TradeLocker, DXtrade

PipFarm PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
−Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

For Traders PROS

+Days to first payout of 2 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
+Min challenge cost of $42 is dramatically below the industry average of $186.7
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring the trader
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps for faster capital access

For Traders CONS

−Profit target of 9% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more effort to pass
−News trading and EA/automated trading are not allowed, limiting strategy flexibility
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, offering less loss tolerance

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm

Lower trust score (56/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH PFAR