RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs Funding Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PFAR

PipFarm

EST. 2023

FNDG

Funding Traders

PIPFARM

METRIC

FUNDING TRADERS

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—60/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER3.5/5

85%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$45—

MIN COST

BETTER$25

7dBETTER

PAYOUT DAYS

—14d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex, fast-payout

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

PipFarm PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
−Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm

Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH PFAR