RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs Funded Futures Network

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PFAR

PipFarm

EST. 2023

FFNT

Funded Futures Network

EST. 2022

PIPFARM

METRIC

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK

72/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

0/5TIE

RATING

TIE0/5

85%BETTER

PROFIT SPLIT

—80%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$250,000

$45BETTER

MIN COST

—$81

7d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER0d

—

PASS RATE

—

0TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex, fast-payout

FUNDED FUTURES NETWORK DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: Rithmic, Onyx, Quantower

PipFarm PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
−Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

Funded Futures Network PROS

+Min challenge cost of $81 is well below the industry average of $186.7, significantly reducing entry costs.
+Days to first payout of 0 means instant payouts, far better than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+On-demand payout frequency gives traders maximum flexibility in accessing their profits.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.

Funded Futures Network CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing the trader's share of earnings.
−Max funding of $250,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting scale.
−Two-step funding process is above the industry average of 1.6 steps, adding an extra evaluation hurdle.

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm

Higher trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH PFAR