RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs Eclipse Trading

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
PIPFARM
METRIC
ECLIPSE TRADING
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$45
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

Eclipse Trading PROS

  • +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
  • +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
  • +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
  • +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.

Eclipse Trading CONS

  • −No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
  • −Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
  • −Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Eclipse Trading
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

RELATED LINKS

PipFarm Full Review →Eclipse Trading Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy