RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs Eightcap Challenges

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
ECHT
Eightcap Challenges
PIPFARM
METRIC
EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$45
MIN COST
BETTER$5
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
PASS RATE
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

EIGHTCAP CHALLENGES DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Static
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Stocks
PLATFORMS
MT5, TradeLocker, MT4

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

Eightcap Challenges PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $5 is exceptionally low compared to the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Profit target of 9% is slightly above average but paired with a strong 90% split.
  • +Broad market access includes Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Stocks across multiple platforms.

Eightcap Challenges CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, posing higher risk.
  • No days-to-first-payout data is available, limiting transparency on withdrawal timelines.
  • No founding date or country detail is fully confirmed, limiting background verification for traders.

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Eightcap Challenges
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

PipFarm Full Review →Eightcap Challenges Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy