RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs City Traders Imperium

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
City Traders Imperium
CTIM
City Traders Imperium
EST. 2018
PIPFARM
METRIC
CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM
56/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER58/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
3/5
85%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
BETTER$4,000,000
$45BETTER
MIN COST
$129
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
PASS RATE
25%
1TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE1

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

CITY TRADERS IMPERIUM DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, advanced, large-cap

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

City Traders Imperium PROS

  • +Max funding of $4,000,000 is vastly above the industry average of $839,272.7
  • +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Founded in 2018, making it one of the more established firms in the industry
  • +On-demand payouts provide immediate access to profits

City Traders Imperium CONS

  • Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
  • News trading is not allowed, restricting strategy options during high-impact events
  • Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm
Lower trust score (56/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
City Traders Imperium
Higher trust score (58/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

PipFarm Full Review →City Traders Imperium Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy