RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs Brightfunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PipFarm
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
Brightfunded
BFND
Brightfunded
EST. 2023
PIPFARM
METRIC
BRIGHTFUNDED
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—66/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$45BETTER
MIN COST
—$55
7d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS
1-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, fast-payout

BRIGHTFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, DXtrade

PipFarm PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
  • +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
  • −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

Brightfunded PROS

  • +Days to first payout is 1, dramatically faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
  • +Min challenge cost of $55 is well below the industry average of $186.70, lowering entry barriers
  • +Fee refund is offered, providing financial protection for traders who complete the challenge
  • +Supports three platforms — MT5, cTrader, and DXtrade — offering good platform flexibility

Brightfunded CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7% by 4.7 percentage points
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting traders who use fundamental or event-driven strategies
  • −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272, limiting earning potential

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm
Higher trust score (72/100). Slower payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.
Brightfunded
Lower trust score (66/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

PipFarm Full Review →Brightfunded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy