RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
PipFarm vs Black Eagle Financial Group
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
BEFG
Black Eagle Financial Group
PIPFARM
METRIC
BLACK EAGLE FINANCIAL GROUP
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$200,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$45
MIN COST
—
7d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
PIPFARM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout
BLACK EAGLE FINANCIAL GROUP DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
PipFarm PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.
PipFarm CONS
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
- −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.
Black Eagle Financial Group PROS
- +A listing exists for this firm, indicating some level of industry recognition.
- +Absence of restrictive data means no confirmed below-average metrics are on record.
- +The firm's tag is registered, suggesting an intent to operate transparently on a comparison platform.
- +No negative financial metrics are currently documented for this firm.
Black Eagle Financial Group CONS
- −No data whatsoever is available for this firm, making objective evaluation impossible.
- −Traders cannot compare any metrics to industry averages due to complete absence of information.
- −Lack of founding date, country, and trading terms represents a significant transparency concern.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy