RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
PipFarm vs ATFunded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
PFAR
PipFarm
EST. 2023
ATFD
ATFunded
PIPFARM
METRIC
ATFUNDED
72/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
85%BETTER
PROFIT SPLIT
—80%
$200,000TIE
MAX FUNDING
TIE$200,000
$45BETTER
MIN COST
—$49
7dBETTER
PAYOUT DAYS
—14d
—
PASS RATE
—
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0
PIPFARM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
- PLATFORMS
- MT4, MT5
- TYPES
- forex, fast-payout
ATFUNDED DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Trailing EOD
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PipFarm PROS
- +Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
- +News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.
PipFarm CONS
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
- −Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.
ATFunded PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
- +EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
- +Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
- +Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.
ATFunded CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
- −Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy