RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

PipFarm vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

PFAR

PipFarm

EST. 2023

AQUA

Aqua Funded

EST. 2023

PIPFARM

METRIC

AQUA FUNDED

56/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER59/100

4/5TIE

RATING

TIE4/5

85%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$200,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$2,000,000

$45—

MIN COST

BETTER$1

7dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE7d

—

PASS RATE

—

1—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER2

PIPFARM DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5
TYPES: forex, fast-payout

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

PipFarm PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $45 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Single-step funding process beats the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded.
+Profit split of 85% slightly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+News trading, EA/automated trading, and weekend holding are all permitted.

PipFarm CONS

−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Days to first payout at 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5.
−Founded in 2023, offering a limited operational track record for traders to assess.

Aqua Funded PROS

+Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
+Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
−Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

PipFarm

Lower trust score (56/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 85% profit split.

START WITH PFAR