RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneUp Trader vs ZoraFX

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OUPT

OneUp Trader

EST. 2017

ZRFX

ZoraFX

ONEUP TRADER

METRIC

ZORAFX

55/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—48/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$250,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$200,000

$125—

MIN COST

BETTER$59

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER10d

—

PASS RATE

—

2BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, large-cap

ZORAFX DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex
PLATFORMS: MT5

OneUp Trader PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

ZoraFX PROS

+Profit split of 90% is well above the industry average of 84.7%, giving traders a significantly higher earnings share.
+Min challenge cost of $59 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+Fee refund is offered, reducing the effective cost of the challenge upon successful completion.
+Weekend holding and news trading are both permitted, providing strong flexibility for trading strategies.

ZoraFX CONS

−Overall drawdown of 5% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing less margin for drawdown before breach.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
−Days to first payout at 10 is above the industry average of 6.5, meaning a longer wait for initial earnings.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneUp Trader

Higher trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OUPT