OneUp Trader vs Walkthrough Test Firm (TEST)

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

METRIC	OneUp Trader EST. 2017	WALKTHRU Walkthrough Test Firm (TEST)
TRUST SCORE	64/100BETTER	54/100
PROFIT SPLIT	90%BETTER	75%
PAYOUT DAYS	1dBETTER	10d
MIN COST	$65BETTER	$99
MAX FUNDING	$250,000BETTER	$200,000
RATING	5/5BETTER	4.5/5
REVIEW COUNT	2TIE	2TIE
STEPS	1-step	2-step
DRAWDOWN	Trailing	Static

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

OneUp Trader

Higher trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

Walkthrough Test Firm (TEST)

Lower trust score (54/100). Slower payouts at 10d. 75% profit split.