OneUp Trader vs The Trading Pit
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | OneUp Trader EST. 2017 | The Trading Pit EST. 2022 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 64/100 | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%BETTER | 80% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 1dBETTER | 14d |
| MIN COST | $65 | $29BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $250,000BETTER | $200,000 |
| RATING | 5/5 | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 2BETTER | 0 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing | Trailing |
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
THE TRADING PIT DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Metals, Indices, Energies, Crypto, Stocks, Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Quantower, ATAS, Rithmic, Sierra Chart, cTrader
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
- +Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
- +Only 1 evaluation step required, below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms, making it easier to pass.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Max funding of $250,000 is below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room for loss.
- −Weekend holding and news trading are both prohibited, restricting trading flexibility.
The Trading Pit PROS
- +Min challenge cost of $29 is well below the listed firms' average of $69.4.
- +Overall drawdown allowance of 10% exceeds the listed firms' average of 7.9%, giving traders more room.
- +Single evaluation step beats the listed firms' average of 1.6 steps to funded.
- +Seven markets available including Forex, Crypto, Futures, and Stocks, offering broad diversification.
The Trading Pit CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the listed firms' average of 83.2%.
- −Max funding of $200,000 falls short of the listed firms' average of $310,294.1.
- −Payout window of 14 days is longer than the listed firms' average of 9.6 days.
PROPDNA VERDICT
The Trading Pit
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts (14d). 80% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
Risk
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy