Compare/OneUp Trader vs TribeFunded

OneUp Trader vs TribeFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
+Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
+Only 1 evaluation step required, below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
+Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms, making it easier to pass.

−Max funding of $250,000 is below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room for loss.
−Weekend holding and news trading are both prohibited, restricting trading flexibility.

+Profit split is 100%, well above the listed firms' average of 83.2%.
+Max funding reaches $500,000, significantly above the listed firms' average of $310,294.10.
+Minimum challenge cost is $25, far below the listed firms' average of $69.40.
+Overall drawdown allowance is 10%, above the listed firms' average of 7.9%, giving traders more room.

−Payout window is 7 days, slightly slower than the listed firms' average of 9.6 days, though still competitive.
−Requires 2 evaluation steps, above the listed firms' average of 1.6 steps to funded.
−Phase 1 profit target is 8%, in line with but not below the listed firms' average of 8.1%.

OneUp Trader

Trust score 64/100. Faster payouts (1d). 90% profit split.

TribeFunded

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts (7d). 100% profit split.