OneUp Trader vs TribeFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, favouring traders significantly.
+Max funding of $1,500,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Min challenge cost of $20 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very accessible.

−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−Steps to funded is 1, which is positive, but no platform or trading condition details are provided, limiting transparency.
−No information on weekend holding, news trading, EA use, or fee refund policy reduces comparability.

OneUp Trader

Trust score 60/100. Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

TribeFunded

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 7d. 100% profit split.