RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneUp Trader vs Traders Launch

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OUPT

OneUp Trader

EST. 2017

TDLC

Traders Launch

ONEUP TRADER

METRIC

TRADERS LAUNCH

55/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER56/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—2.1/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$250,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$125

MIN COST

—

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER7d

—

PASS RATE

—

2—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER3

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, large-cap

TRADERS LAUNCH DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

OneUp Trader PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

Traders Launch PROS

+Daily payout frequency is highly competitive, offering traders faster access to funds than most firms.
+Days to first payout at 7 is close to the industry average of 6.5, reflecting a reasonable wait time.
+No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.
+No data is available to identify further above-average metrics for Traders Launch.

Traders Launch CONS

−Very limited data is provided, making full comparison to industry averages impossible across most metrics.
−Without profit split, funding size, or challenge cost data, overall value cannot be properly assessed.
−Lack of transparency on drawdown, targets, and steps to funded limits trader decision-making confidence.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneUp Trader

Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OUPT