Compare/OneUp Trader vs Trading Cult

OneUp Trader vs Trading Cult

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
+Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
+Only 1 evaluation step required, below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
+Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms, making it easier to pass.

−Max funding of $250,000 is below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room for loss.
−Weekend holding and news trading are both prohibited, restricting trading flexibility.

+Overall drawdown allowance of 8% exceeds the listed-firms average of 7.9%, giving traders slightly more room.
+Single-step evaluation is below the listed-firms average of 1.6 steps, reaching funded faster.
+News trading is permitted, allowing traders to hold positions through high-volatility events.
+Three platform options (MT4, MT5, cTrader) provide flexibility across popular trading environments.

−Minimum challenge cost of $107 is above the listed-firms average of $69.4, making entry more expensive.
−Profit split of 80% is below the listed-firms average of 83.2%, reducing trader earnings.
−Maximum funding of $200,000 is below the listed-firms average of $310,294.1, capping earning potential.

OneUp Trader

Higher trust score (64/100). Faster payouts (1d). 90% profit split.

Trading Cult

Lower trust score (54/100). Slower payouts (14d). 80% profit split.