RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneUp Trader vs RebelsFunding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OUPT

OneUp Trader

EST. 2017

RBLS

RebelsFunding

EST. 2023

ONEUP TRADER

METRIC

REBELSFUNDING

55/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—42/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—3/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$250,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$320,000

$125—

MIN COST

BETTER$9

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—1

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, large-cap

REBELSFUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: 4-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex

OneUp Trader PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

RebelsFunding PROS

+Min challenge cost of $9 is extraordinarily low compared to the industry average of $186.7, minimising entry risk.
+Profit target of 5% is well below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to complete.
+Fee refund is available, giving traders the opportunity to recover the challenge cost.
+Fixed drawdown type provides clearly defined and stable risk parameters for traders.

RebelsFunding CONS

−Steps to funded is 4, far above the industry average of 1.6, requiring significantly more evaluation stages.
−Max funding of $320,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting potential earnings.
−Markets are limited to forex only, offering no diversification into indices, metals, commodities, or crypto.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneUp Trader

Higher trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OUPT