OneUp Trader vs QT Funded
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | OneUp Trader EST. 2017 | QT Funded EST. 2023 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 64/100 | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%BETTER | 80% |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 1dBETTER | 14d |
| MIN COST | $65 | $33BETTER |
| MAX FUNDING | $250,000BETTER | $200,000 |
| RATING | 5/5 | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 2BETTER | 0 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 2-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing | Static-Balance |
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
QT FUNDED DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MetaTrader 5, cTrader, TradeLocker
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the average of 83.2% across listed firms.
- +Payout window of 1 day is well below the average of 9.6 days across listed firms.
- +Only 1 evaluation step required, below the average of 1.6 steps across listed firms.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the average of 8.1% across listed firms, making it easier to pass.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Max funding of $250,000 is below the average of $310,294.1 across listed firms.
- −Overall drawdown of 6% is below the average of 7.9% across listed firms, leaving less room for loss.
- −Weekend holding and news trading are both prohibited, restricting trading flexibility.
QT Funded PROS
- +Overall drawdown allowance is 10%, above the listed firms' average of 7.9%.
- +Minimum challenge cost is $33, well below the listed firms' average of $69.4.
- +Challenge fee is refunded upon successful funding, reducing total trader cost.
- +Three platform options available (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker) across five asset classes.
QT Funded CONS
- −Profit split is 80%, below the listed firms' average of 83.2%.
- −Max funding is $200,000, below the listed firms' average of $310,294.1.
- −Payout window is 14 days, longer than the listed firms' average of 9.6 days.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Risk
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Commissions never affect rankings or Trust Scores, which follow our published methodology.Privacy Policy