RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneUp Trader vs QT Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OUPT

OneUp Trader

EST. 2017

QT Funded

EST. 2023

ONEUP TRADER

METRIC

QT FUNDED

55/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER64/100

4/5—

RATING

BETTER5/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$250,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$125—

MIN COST

BETTER$12

14d—

PAYOUT DAYS

BETTER1d

—

PASS RATE

—

2TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE2

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, large-cap

QT FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Metals, Indices, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker

OneUp Trader PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

QT Funded PROS

+Minimum challenge cost of $12 is drastically below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 1 day is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the challenge.
+Profit target of 7% is below the industry average of 8%, making the target easier to hit.

QT Funded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
−Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, indicating higher risk tolerance required.
−News trading is not allowed, restricting a commonly used trading strategy.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneUp Trader

Lower trust score (55/100). Slower payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OUPT