RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneUp Trader vs Pip Traders Funding

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OUPT

OneUp Trader

EST. 2017

PTFD

Pip Traders Funding

ONEUP TRADER

METRIC

PIP TRADERS FUNDING

55/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—40/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$250,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$125

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, large-cap

PIP TRADERS FUNDING DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

OneUp Trader PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

Pip Traders Funding PROS

+The firm name implies a focus on forex funding, which is the most widely traded market globally.
+A dedicated funding model suggests a structured approach to trader evaluation and capital allocation.
+Pip-based performance naming may indicate a focus on measurable, transparent trading metrics.
+Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.

Pip Traders Funding CONS

−No data has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost data, no industry comparisons can be made.
−Traders cannot make informed decisions without disclosure of core terms and conditions for this firm.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneUp Trader

Higher trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OUPT