OneUp Trader vs My Funded Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

+Profit split of 90% is notably above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the funded threshold easier to reach.
+Wide platform support includes TradingView, NinjaTrader, Quantower, Tradovate, DeepDOM, and DeepChart.
+News trading and EA/automated trading are both permitted.

−Days to first payout at 14 days is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting position management across market closures.

OneUp Trader

Higher trust score (64/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

My Funded Futures

Lower trust score (61/100). Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.