HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
OneUp Trader vs Lucid Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | OneUp Trader EST. 2017 | Lucid Trading EST. 2025 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 64/100BETTER | 63/100 |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%TIE | 90%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 1d | 0dBETTER |
| MIN COST | $65BETTER | $135 |
| MAX FUNDING | $250,000BETTER | $150,000 |
| RATING | 4/5 | 4.67/5BETTER |
| REVIEW COUNT | 3BETTER | 2 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing | EOD Trailing |
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
LUCID TRADING DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Tradovate, TradingView, Quantower, Sierra Chart, MotiveWave, Jigsaw, Bookmap, ATAS, R, Trader Pro, MultiCharts, Tradesea
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
Lucid Trading PROS
- +Profit split of 90% is above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +On-demand payouts offer maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
- +Wide platform selection including NinjaTrader, Tradovate, Rithmic, MotiveWave, and QuantTower
Lucid Trading CONS
- −No max funding data provided, preventing comparison to the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Profit target of 8% is slightly above the industry average of 7.9%, marginally harder to achieve
- −Trailing EOD drawdown type can be more restrictive than fixed drawdown structures
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy