RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
OneUp Trader vs Get Funded Now
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
GFND
Get Funded Now
ONEUP TRADER
METRIC
GET FUNDED NOW
51/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER90%
$250,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$125—
MIN COST
BETTER$123
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
GET FUNDED NOW DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
Get Funded Now PROS
- +Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +On-demand payouts provide maximum flexibility in accessing earned profits
Get Funded Now CONS
- −Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering less buffer
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
- −Max funding of $200,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy