RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneUp Trader vs Goat Funded Futures

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OUPT

OneUp Trader

EST. 2017

GFFU

Goat Funded Futures

ONEUP TRADER

METRIC

GOAT FUNDED FUTURES

55/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—45/100

4/5TIE

RATING

TIE4/5

80%

PROFIT SPLIT

—

$250,000

MAX FUNDING

—

$125

MIN COST

—

14d

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

—

2TIE

REVIEW COUNT

TIE2

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, large-cap

GOAT FUNDED FUTURES DETAILS

STEPS: -phase
MARKETS: Futures

OneUp Trader PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

Goat Funded Futures PROS

+Listed as a futures firm, providing access to an asset class not offered by all prop firms.
+Hong Kong base may offer access to Asian market hours and related futures instruments.
+Futures markets offer high liquidity and defined contract structures attractive to professional traders.
+Specialisation in futures suggests a focused and potentially expert evaluation framework.

Goat Funded Futures CONS

−No trading data has been provided for this firm, making objective comparison impossible.
−Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry benchmarks can be applied.
−Traders cannot assess suitability or value without disclosure of core terms and conditions.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneUp Trader

Higher trust score (55/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OUPT