OneUp Trader vs Funded Trading Plus

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

+On-demand payouts offer faster access to profits than monthly or bi-weekly schedules
+Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted
+Four platforms supported (cTrader, DXTrade, Match Trader, MT5) offering broad trader choice
+Wide market access including Crypto, Energy, Indices, Metals, Commodities, and FX

−Min challenge cost of $1,759 is dramatically above the industry average of $186.7
−Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7
−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%

OneUp Trader

Trust score 60/100. Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

Funded Trading Plus

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.