HEAD-TO-HEAD · 2026
OneUp Trader vs FuturesElite
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
| METRIC | OneUp Trader EST. 2017 | FuturesElite EST. 2024 |
|---|---|---|
| TRUST SCORE | 60/100 | — |
| PROFIT SPLIT | 90%TIE | 90%TIE |
| PAYOUT DAYS | 1dTIE | 1dTIE |
| MIN COST | $65BETTER | $129 |
| MAX FUNDING | $250,000BETTER | $150,000 |
| RATING | 4/5 | — |
| REVIEW COUNT | 1BETTER | 0 |
| STEPS | 1-step | 1-step |
| DRAWDOWN | Trailing | EOD Trailing |
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
FUTURESELITE DETAILS
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- Tradovate, NinjaTrader, Quantower, ATAS, Volumetrica, DeepDom, DeepCharts
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
FuturesElite PROS
- +Profit split of 100% is exceptional and far above the industry average of 84.7%, maximising trader earnings.
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
- +Steps to funded is 1, well below the industry average of 1.6, enabling faster access to capital.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge easier to achieve.
FuturesElite CONS
- −Max funding of $150,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
- −Overall drawdown is dollar-denominated at $2,000 and cannot be meaningfully compared to the percentage-based industry average.
- −No daily drawdown limit is listed, which may introduce uncertainty around intraday risk controls.
PROPDNA VERDICT
FuturesElite
Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.
RELATED LINKS
RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy