RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
OneUp Trader vs FundedFirm
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
FNFM
FundedFirm
ONEUP TRADER
METRIC
FUNDEDFIRM
51/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%—
PROFIT SPLIT
BETTER100%
$250,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$100,000
$125BETTER
MIN COST
—$549
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
FUNDEDFIRM DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex
- PLATFORMS
- MT5
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
FundedFirm PROS
- +100% profit split is exceptionally above the industry average of 84.7%
- +Days to first payout of 1 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Single-step evaluation is below the industry average of 1.6 steps to funded
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the net cost of the evaluation
FundedFirm CONS
- −Max funding of $100,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.70
- −Min challenge cost of $549 is significantly above the industry average of $186.7
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy