RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneUp Trader vs Funding Traders

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OUPT

OneUp Trader

EST. 2017

FNDG

Funding Traders

ONEUP TRADER

METRIC

FUNDING TRADERS

51/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER60/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—3.5/5

80%—

PROFIT SPLIT

BETTER90%

$250,000—

MAX FUNDING

BETTER$400,000

$125—

MIN COST

BETTER$25

14dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE14d

—

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, large-cap

FUNDING TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, Stocks

OneUp Trader PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

Funding Traders PROS

+Min challenge cost of $25 is far below the industry average of $186.7, making evaluation highly affordable.
+Profit split of 90% exceeds the industry average of 84.7%, with a fee refund also available to traders.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making the evaluation threshold easier to achieve.
+Covers five asset classes including Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto, and Stocks, offering strong diversification.

Funding Traders CONS

−Overall drawdown of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, providing a tighter risk boundary for traders.
−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, delaying profit access.
−Max funding of $400,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting maximum earning potential.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneUp Trader

Lower trust score (51/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OUPT