RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
OneUp Trader vs Funderpro
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
FDRP
Funderpro
EST. 2023
ONEUP TRADER
METRIC
FUNDERPRO
55/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER65/100
4/5—
RATING
BETTER4.78/5
80%TIE
PROFIT SPLIT
TIE80%
$250,000BETTER
MAX FUNDING
—$200,000
$125—
MIN COST
BETTER$79
14d—
PAYOUT DAYS
BETTER1d
—
PASS RATE
—
2—
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER3
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
FUNDERPRO DETAILS
- STEPS
- 2-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
- PLATFORMS
- MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
Funderpro PROS
- +Days to first payout of 1 is far below the industry average of 6.5 days
- +Min challenge cost of $79 is well below the industry average of $186.7
- +Fee refund is available, reducing the financial risk of the evaluation process
- +Four platforms supported (MT5, cTrader, TradeLocker, Match-Trader) offering broad trader choice
Funderpro CONS
- −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%
- −Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring more gain to pass evaluation
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing traders
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy