RISK
Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning
HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026
OneUp Trader vs Eclipse Trading
Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.
OUPT
OneUp Trader
EST. 2017
ECLT
Eclipse Trading
EST. 2007
ONEUP TRADER
METRIC
ECLIPSE TRADING
51/100BETTER
TRUST SCORE
—0/100
4/5BETTER
RATING
—0/5
80%
PROFIT SPLIT
—
$250,000
MAX FUNDING
—
$125
MIN COST
—
14d
PAYOUT DAYS
—
—
PASS RATE
—
1BETTER
REVIEW COUNT
—0
ONEUP TRADER DETAILS
- STEPS
- 1-phase
- DRAWDOWN
- Fixed
- MARKETS
- Futures
- PLATFORMS
- NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
- TYPES
- futures, large-cap
ECLIPSE TRADING DETAILS
- STEPS
- -phase
OneUp Trader PROS
- +Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
- +Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
- +Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
- +Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.
OneUp Trader CONS
- −Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
- −Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
- −Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.
Eclipse Trading PROS
- +Founded in 2007, making it one of the longest-established firms in the dataset.
- +Country of operation is listed as Hong Kong, indicating an established international presence.
- +Longevity since 2007 suggests operational stability over nearly two decades.
- +Early founding date may indicate experience navigating multiple market cycles.
Eclipse Trading CONS
- −No trading or financial metrics are available to evaluate this firm objectively.
- −Without data on profit split, funding, or costs, no meaningful comparison to industry averages is possible.
- −Traders cannot assess key terms like drawdown, payout speed, or profit targets from available data.
PROPDNA VERDICT
RELATED LINKS
Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy