OneUp Trader vs E8 Markets

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

MARKETS: Futures (CME, CBOT, COMEX, NYMEX - equity index, currency, energy, metals, agricultural, interest rate futures)
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, R, Trader Pro, Sierra Chart, Bookmap, MultiCharts, Quantower, MotiveWave, Jigsaw Trading, Agena Trader, Volfix, Medved Trader
TYPES: futures, large-cap

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

+Min challenge cost of $58 is well below the industry average of $186.7, lowering entry barriers.
+Max funding of $1,000,000 exceeds the industry average of $839,272.7, offering strong scaling potential.
+Days to first payout of 3 is significantly faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Wide platform selection including MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, and TradeLocker suits diverse trader preferences.

−Profit split of 80% falls below the industry average of 84.7%, reducing trader earnings.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting flexibility for swing and position traders.
−Steps to funded is 2, above the industry average of 1.6, requiring more evaluation stages.

OneUp Trader

Trust score 60/100. Faster payouts at 1d. 90% profit split.

E8 Markets

Not yet rated by PropDNA traders. Slower payouts at 3d. 80% profit split.