RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

OneUp Trader vs ATFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OUPT

OneUp Trader

EST. 2017

ATFD

ATFunded

ONEUP TRADER

METRIC

ATFUNDED

51/100BETTER

TRUST SCORE

—0/100

4/5BETTER

RATING

—0/5

80%TIE

PROFIT SPLIT

TIE80%

$250,000BETTER

MAX FUNDING

—$200,000

$125—

MIN COST

BETTER$49

14dTIE

PAYOUT DAYS

TIE14d

—

PASS RATE

—

1BETTER

REVIEW COUNT

—0

ONEUP TRADER DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Futures
PLATFORMS: NinjaTrader, Sierra Chart, Rithmic
TYPES: futures, large-cap

ATFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Trailing EOD
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Crypto

OneUp Trader PROS

+Single-step funding process is faster than the industry average of 1.6 steps.
+Minimum challenge cost of $125 is below the industry average of $186.7.
+Profit target of 6% is below the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation easier to pass.
+Founded in 2017, making it one of the more established prop firms in the industry.

OneUp Trader CONS

−Days to first payout of 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days.
−Max funding of $250,000 is well below the industry average of $839,272.7.
−Weekend holding is not allowed, restricting trader flexibility over weekends.

ATFunded PROS

+Min challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7, making entry very affordable.
+EA/automated trading is permitted, supporting algorithmic and systematic trading strategies.
+Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, offering more buffer before a breach occurs.
+Multi-market access including Forex, Indices, Commodities, and Crypto provides good diversification options.

ATFunded CONS

−Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%, meaning traders retain less of their profits.
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7, limiting earning potential.
−Days to first payout at 14 is more than double the industry average of 6.5 days, significantly slowing cash flow.

PROPDNA VERDICT

OneUp Trader

Higher trust score (51/100). Faster payouts at 14d. 80% profit split.

START WITH OUPT