RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

One Step vs FundedNext

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OSTP

One Step

FNXT

FundedNext

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2022

ONE STEP

METRIC

FUNDEDNEXT

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER88/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER4.4/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

95%

—

MAX FUNDING

$300,000

—

MIN COST

$49

—

PAYOUT DAYS

—

PASS RATE

29%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER6,750

ONE STEP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

FUNDEDNEXT DETAILS

STEPS: 2-phase
DRAWDOWN: Relative
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Commodities, Futures, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT4, MT5, cTrader, TradingView
TYPES: forex, fast-payout, multi-asset, futures, crypto

One Step PROS

+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
+No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
+No platform or market information is available to assess trading flexibility
+Firm name suggests a one-step model, but no data is provided to confirm this

One Step CONS

−No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
−Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against industry averages
−Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

FundedNext PROS

+Profit split of 95% is well above the industry average of 84.7%.
+Minimum challenge cost of $49 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
+Days to first payout of 4 is faster than the industry average of 6.5 days.
+Fee refund is offered, and weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted.

FundedNext CONS

−Overall drawdown of 10% with a relative drawdown type is above the industry average of 7.9% and more restrictive in practice.
−Profit target of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, making evaluation harder to pass.
−Max funding of $300,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272.7.

PROPDNA VERDICT

One Step

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH OSTP