RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

One Step vs OneFunded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OSTP

One Step

1FND

OneFunded

✓ VERIFIEDEST. 2023

ONE STEP

METRIC

ONEFUNDED

0/100—

TRUST SCORE

BETTER55/100

0/5—

RATING

BETTER1/5

—

PROFIT SPLIT

90%

—

MAX FUNDING

$200,000

—

MIN COST

$59

—

PAYOUT DAYS

14d

—

PASS RATE

35%

0—

REVIEW COUNT

BETTER1

ONE STEP DETAILS

STEPS: -phase

ONEFUNDED DETAILS

STEPS: 1-phase
DRAWDOWN: Fixed
MARKETS: Forex, Indices, Crypto, Metals, Stocks
PLATFORMS: MT5, cTrader
TYPES: forex, beginner, multi-asset, crypto

One Step PROS

+No data is available to identify any above-average metrics for this firm
+No fee, payout, or structure data provided to evaluate competitiveness
+No platform or market information is available to assess trading flexibility
+Firm name suggests a one-step model, but no data is provided to confirm this

One Step CONS

−No data is provided for this firm, making any meaningful comparison impossible
−Traders cannot assess profit split, funding, or costs against industry averages
−Complete absence of data is a significant transparency concern for traders making financial decisions

OneFunded PROS

+No time limits on eval
+4 challenge tracks
+Transparent rules

OneFunded CONS

−Days to first payout is 14, more than double the industry average of 6.5 days
−Max funding of $200,000 is significantly below the industry average of $839,272
−Pass rate of 35% suggests moderate selectivity, though no drawdown or profit target data is provided for context

PROPDNA VERDICT

One Step

Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.

START WITH OSTP