RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

ORA Traders vs Aqua Funded

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

ORAT
ORA Traders
Aqua Funded
AQUA
Aqua Funded
EST. 2023
ORA TRADERS
METRIC
AQUA FUNDED
44/100
TRUST SCORE
BETTER59/100
5/5BETTER
RATING
4/5
PROFIT SPLIT
90%
MAX FUNDING
$2,000,000
MIN COST
$1
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
PASS RATE
1
REVIEW COUNT
BETTER2

ORA TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

AQUA FUNDED DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Trailing
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Metals, Commodities, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT5, cTrader, Match-Trader, TradeLocker

ORA Traders PROS

  • +No data is available on profit split, funding, or cost metrics for this firm
  • +No data is available on drawdown or profit target for this firm
  • +No data is available on payout timing or steps to funded for this firm
  • +No data is available on platforms, markets, or founding date for this firm

ORA Traders CONS

  • Virtually no data is provided, making any objective evaluation impossible
  • Traders cannot compare this firm's terms to the industry average of 84.7% profit split
  • Lack of transparency on key metrics is a significant risk for traders making financial decisions

Aqua Funded PROS

  • +Min challenge cost of just $1 is exceptionally below the industry average of $186.7, making it highly accessible.
  • +Max funding of $2,000,000 is more than double the industry average of $839,272.7.
  • +Profit split of 90% significantly exceeds the industry average of 84.7%.
  • +Weekend holding, news trading, and EA use are all permitted, offering maximum trading flexibility.

Aqua Funded CONS

  • Overall drawdown of 10% is above the industry average of 7.9%, requiring traders to manage larger potential losses.
  • Profit target of 10% is higher than the industry average of 7.9%, making the challenge harder to pass.
  • Days to first payout of 7 is slightly above the industry average of 6.5 days.

PROPDNA VERDICT

ORA Traders
Lower trust score (44/100). Slower payouts at —d.
Aqua Funded
Higher trust score (59/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 90% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

ORA Traders Full Review →Aqua Funded Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy