RISK

Trading carries substantial risk of loss. Prop evaluation fees are typically non-refundable and the majority of traders do not pass first attempts. This comparison is for informational purposes only and does not constitute financial advice. Read full risk warning

HEAD-TO-HEAD COMPARISON · 2026

Optimal Traders vs FXIFY

Side-by-side comparison of trust scores, profit splits, payout speed, and real trader reviews. Independent data — no sponsored rankings.

OPTM
Optimal Traders
FXIFY
FXFY
FXIFY
EST. 2022
OPTIMAL TRADERS
METRIC
FXIFY
0/100—
TRUST SCORE
BETTER78/100
0/5TIE
RATING
TIE0/5
—
PROFIT SPLIT
80%
—
MAX FUNDING
$400,000
—
MIN COST
$32
—
PAYOUT DAYS
7d
—
PASS RATE
15%
0TIE
REVIEW COUNT
TIE0

OPTIMAL TRADERS DETAILS

STEPS
-phase

FXIFY DETAILS

STEPS
2-phase
DRAWDOWN
Fixed
MARKETS
Forex, Indices, Commodities, Metals, Crypto
PLATFORMS
MT4, MT5
TYPES
forex, multi-asset, fast-payout

Optimal Traders PROS

  • +The firm name implies an optimisation-focused approach to trader evaluation and development.
  • +Inclusion on a comparison platform indicates some degree of public presence and accountability.
  • +A structured funding model, if present, could support disciplined and performance-driven traders.
  • +Potential for competitive terms cannot be ruled out without further data disclosure.

Optimal Traders CONS

  • −No data whatsoever has been provided for this firm, making any objective evaluation impossible.
  • −Without profit split, drawdown, funding levels, or challenge cost, no industry comparisons can be made.
  • −Traders cannot make any informed decisions without full disclosure of this firm's core terms and conditions.

FXIFY PROS

  • +Minimum challenge cost of $32 is well below the industry average of $186.7.
  • +On-demand payouts offer more flexibility than fixed payout schedules.
  • +Max funding of $400,000 is well above the industry average of $839,272.7 — note: still below average but competitive among mid-tier firms.
  • +EA/automated trading and weekend holding are both permitted, supporting diverse strategies.

FXIFY CONS

  • −Profit split of 80% is below the industry average of 84.7%.
  • −News trading is not allowed, restricting a widely used trading approach.
  • −Pass rate of only 15% suggests the challenge conditions are difficult to complete successfully.

PROPDNA VERDICT

Optimal Traders
Lower trust score (0/100). Slower payouts at —d.
FXIFY
Higher trust score (78/100). Faster payouts at 7d. 80% profit split.

RELATED LINKS

Optimal Traders Full Review →FXIFY Full Review →All Comparisons →
← COMPARE ALL FIRMS ON PROPDNA

Affiliate disclosure: PropDNA may earn a commission if you start a challenge through links on this page. Scores are calculated algorithmically from verified trader reviews — not influenced by commercial relationships.Privacy Policy